Monthly Archives: March 2008

Chinese government hasn’t been tracking drug manufacturers

Chinese government hasn’t been tracking drug manufacturers, much less regulating them, or ensuring drug safety. This arises out the investigation of (at least) four deaths linked to heparin sold in the United States by Baxter International, which contained ingredients made by a firm called Changzhou SPL, which is in China but whose majority ownership is held by the American company Scientific Protein Laboratories.

Excellent recent account (from which most of the details above were obtained can be found in Blood Thinner Might Be Tied to More Deaths," by Walt Bogdanich, and "China Didn’t Check Drug Supplier, Files Show ," by Bogdanich and Jake Hooker, both of The New York Times .

Since getting drug companies to behave themselves responsibly is often so difficult – and setting up regulatory schemes is difficult even in the absence of an industry determined to resist regulation – we’d like to propose an interim solution: require that all pharmaceuticals which contain any ingredients, packaging, or in any other way have been produced in China, be explicitly and brightly labeled. The text might be only "Some components may have been made in the People’s Republic of China." As an interim measure, this might allow the market to assist in reducing the risks associated with taking medication.

New York Observer plans network of 50 state political websites

Politicker

– Inside Politics for Political Insider – has been started by Jared Kushner, the publisher of The New York Observer

. At present they’ve got about a dozen sites up, includings PoliticsNJ.com, (Now PolitickerNJ.com ) which was acquired, rather than being built by the Observer group. To the extent that it creates more detailed coverage of statehouses – and perhaps some competition to provide richer news streams, and more transparency, this could be a very good thing. The plan seems to be to use two or three full-timers in each state, and a much larger number of “editors” – who will come from the ranks of political insiders. Perhaps if the recruitment is sufficiently heterogeneous, biases will be overcome or at least clearly stated. Since New York isn’t one of the states that’s up yet, it’s difficult for us to judge – but the New Jersey site looks pretty good.

Before the canonization proceedings begin

His charm notwithstanding, let’s remember some of the things William F. Buckley stood for:

“The central question that emerges…is whether the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas where it does not predominate numerically? The sobering answer is Yes-the White community is so entitled because, for the time being, it is the advanced race.”
-William F. Buckley, National Review, August 24, 1957

ViaMaking Light

.

Here’s the opening graf of the Times obituary :

William F. Buckley Jr., who marshaled polysyllabic exuberance, famously arched eyebrows and a refined, perspicacious mind to elevate conservatism to the center of American political discourse, died Wednesday at his home in Stamford, Conn. He was 82.

We thought that the notion of “advanced race” put one at the edge, rather than the center, of American politics. Perhaps this is part of an editorial policy of being polite. But it does reek of inaccuracy and timidity.

U.S. forces may have (illegal) chemical weapons capability in Iraq

Wikileaks has a report, “U.S. Military Equipment in Iraq (2007),” based on leaked documents, outlining the array and cost of equipment held by United States forces in Iraq:

[photopress:M33A1_500_x_193_via_Wikileaks.jpg,full,pp_image]

 

Important points (on our first reading) include: Chemical and biological weapons portable facilities

The United States has been caught with at least 2,386 low-grade chemical weapons deployed in Iraq. The items appear in a spectacular 2,000 page leak of nearly one million items of US military equipment deployed in Iraq given to the government transparency group Wikileaks

. The items are labeled under the military’s own NATO supply classificationChemical weapons and equipment. Continue reading