Google v China, and Baidu v Iran

by L J Furman on January 13, 2010

in China, Framing the Debate, Free Speech, Google

Google announced that it believes that China is responsible for cyber attacks on Google China. Google is now unwilling to censor search results in China (The Guardian).

Google China

Google China. by Phillipe Lopez/AFP/Getty Images.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, about to begin a tour of Asia, said “We have been briefed by Google on these allegations, which raise very serious concerns and questions. We look to the Chinese government for an explanation.” (The Guardian / NY Times).On their blog (here), in a post entitled “A New Approach to China” Google said:

“In mid-December, we detected a highly sophisticated and targeted attack on our corporate infrastructure originating from China that resulted in the theft of intellectual property from Google.”

“At least twenty other large companies from a wide range of businesses–including the Internet, finance, technology, media and chemical sectors–have been similarly targeted.

“we have evidence to suggest that a primary goal of the attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists.”

“These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered–combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web–have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China. We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.”

China responded on Danwei.org by claiming that Baidu.com was hacked by a group calling itself the “Iranian Cyber Army” (here).  It appears that search engines are hacked all the time in China and like free speech, computer security doesn’t exist in China.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

L J Furman January 18, 2010 at 11:39 pm

As noted in Business Week (http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/jan2010/gb20100113_124533_page_2.htm ) the financial implications are trivial. Google is threatening to leave China and give up potential sales of $600 million, approximately 2.3% of its expected $26 Billion sales. It is contemplating giving up a 35.6% share of a market in which its competitor has 58.4%, almost double it’s share, a market it was criticized for entering because of Chinese government requirements to dramatically censor any content critical of China and doing this because, Google alleges, it’s computers have been hacked, and intellectual property stolen.

Google probably has to censor discussions of the reasons it was criticized for entering China and the reasons it is contemplating ceasing operations in China.

The long term implications, however, are profound. What if other technology companies start to worry that the Chinese will steal their intellectual property? What will that do to the price of a computer, or a television? Will it prompt companies to resume manufacturing here?

Previous post:

Next post: