popular logistics

Laura Strickler of the CBS News Investigative Unit reports on CBSNews.com that the Pentagon’s Inspector General has found that a great deal of equipment in Iraq is unaccounted for:

Tractor trailers, tank recovery vehicles, crates of machine guns and rocket propelled grenades are just a sampling of more than $1 billion in unaccounted for military equipment and services provided to the Iraqi security forces, according to a new report issued today by the Pentagon Inspector General and obtained exclusively by the CBS News investigative unit. Auditors for the Inspector General reviewed equipment contracts totaling $643 million but could only find an audit trail for $83 million.

The report details a massive failure in government procurement revealing little accountability for the billions of dollars spent purchasing military hardware for the Iraqi security forces. For example, according to the report, the military could not account for 12,712 out of 13,508 weapons, including pistols, assault rifles, rocket propelled grenade launchers and machine guns.

The report comes on the same day that Army procurement officials will face tough questions from the Senate Armed Services Committee regarding their procurement policies. One official, Claude Bolton, assistant secretary for acquisition, logistics and technology has already announced his resignation on the heels of sharp criticism of army contracting. Bolton’s resignation is effective Jan. 2, 2008. The Army has significantly expanded its fraud investigations in recent months.

Celeste Monforton of The Pump Handle has a disturbing account of the current status of the Crandall Canyon disaster: Congress has cancelled scheduled hearings; even more disturbing, there’s an emerging record of failure(s)  to report hazards  as required - and  what appears to  have been the  willful destruction of evidence. 

Disturbing any way you look at it - assuming that you think workplaces ought to be safe. (If you don’t think that, I’m afraid my advocacy skills may not be up to the challenge).

Link to Dr. Monforton’s piece at The Pump Handle.  We’ll try to follow up.

Tom VanDen Brook of USA today has reported that

The Pentagon has asked Congress for $1.4 billion in emergency spending to combat a growing threat of sniper attacks in Iraq based on an overstated assessment of the extent of the attacks, its records show.

In last week’s spending request, the Pentagon said sniper attacks have quadrupled in the past year and, if unchecked, the attacks could eclipse roadside bombs as the top killer of U.S. troops. However, the rate of sniper attacks has dropped slightly in 2007 and fallen dramatically in the past four months, according to military records given to USA TODAY.

Pentagon officials acknowledged the mistake Monday after questions about the data were raised by USA TODAY.

“The term quadrupled will be removed from the justification because it is simply incorrect,” said Dave Patterson, deputy undersecretary of Defense.

In 2006, there were 386 sniper attacks on coalition forces, according to data from the Multi-National Force-Iraq headquarters in Iraq. Through Oct. 26 of this year, there were 269 sniper attacks, the figures show.

The Pentagon does not release the number of troops killed by snipers. Improvised explosive devices have killed about 1,600 U.S. troops, more than half of all combat deaths since the war began in 2003. 

NB: to follow this story with some nuance, readers are advised to read Trent Stamp’s Take. TST is the blog of Trent Stamp (scroll down for bio), the founder of Charity Navigator. Many of comments are thoughtful and illuminating - suggesting that Stamp’s created a small community with shared concerns about nonprofit governance.

Link to Stamp’s most recent post - “Red Cross Debacle: Day Two.”

Stephanie Strom has been covering the ARC and other nonprofits for the Times for a couple of years. This is from her Thursday piece (November 29th), Firing Stirs New Debate Over Red Cross:

Nonprofit experts said that the Red Cross needed to move quickly to fill its top job, but that its culture, which is averse to change, coupled with the missteps of over more than a decade, would make it a difficult job to fill.

“You need someone like Colin Powell to step in,” said Paul C. Light, a professor of public service at New York University who does an annual survey of confidence in charities. “But there aren’t that many national figures like that who’ll take the job, and within that pool, there aren’t any who know anything about disaster relief, let alone blood. And who would take this job under these circumstances, anyway?”

I’m not certain what Professor Light means by “like Colin Powell” - particularly because Secretary Powell’s conduct prior to the invasion of Iraq has given many of his admirers pause.

We’d like to suggest six candidates to lead the Red Cross, and one structural change.

Candidates for the top post

Four people, any of whom would be outstanding in the top post:

• Dr. Irwin Redlener, pediatrician, author of Americans At Risk, founder, with Paul Simon (not the senator) of the Children’s Health Fund, and head of the National Center for Disaster Preparedness at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University (The Children’s Health Fund has four stars from Charity Navigator); (A cursory review of the ARC’s history suggests that Dr. Redlener might be the first Jewish person to head the Red Cross);
• Craig Fugate head of emergency services for the State of Florida (post about Fugate background coming later in the day);
• William Bratton, currently the Chief of Police in Los Angeles; he’s also been head of the NYC Transit Police, Boston’s transit police equivalent, and Police Commissioner for the City of New York. Some may remember that he was forced out - despite outstanding successes - by then-mayor Rudolph Giuliani. Bratton has a history of doing impressive things without telling reporters about them: patrolling subways by himself and in uniform in the middle of the night, and he has a history of rescuing dogs and volunteering in animal shelters. This is in contrast to, for instance, a recent Cabinet member who made regular trips to Walter Reed to visit wounded soldiers - but made sure lots and lots of reporters knew about it.
• Paul Maniscalco, former Deputy Chief of New York City’s Emergency Medical Service, co-author of “Understanding Terrorism and Managing the Consequences,” and currently on the faculty at George Washington University.

Disclosure: I’ve done unpaid consulting for Dr. Redlener, and hope I don’t unduly flatter myself by claiming him as a friend; I’ve corresponded with Craig Fugate, and pestered him with research questions, but we’ve never met; Bratton and I have several friends in common, and we’ve met - the first time walking our respective dogs in Central Park. We talked for an hour and it wasn’t until the next day that I knew who I’d met. Paul Maniscalco’s wife and I were colleagues at an investigative firm, and became friends.

Appoint an Inspector General - either in addition to, or in place of, the Ombudsman

ARC clearly has integrity and ethics issues - nationally and in regional and local branches. A strong Inspector General System - with authority over the national organization and the affiliates - would go a long way towards restoring trust.

Two oustanding candidates for ARC’s first Inspector General

Clark Kent Irvin - former IG for the Department of Homeland Security and before that the IG of the United States Department of State. And the author of Open Target: Where America Is Vulnerable to Attac, an account of his work - and frustrations - as Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security. 

Bunnatine (”Bunny”) Greenhouse -  the chief contracting officer for the Army Corps of Engineers - with a stellar record - until she complained about Halliburton’s no-bid contracts - and lost her job.

Using Mr. Ervin  or Ms. Greenhouse as an Inspector General (or  auditor, etc.) would immediately send a message that the ARC is serious about integrity and transparency - by hiring someone who puts integrity ahead of career.

This must be one of those “absent-minded” professors we’re always hearing about. Because he’s apparently not one of the “treehugging liberal elite,” either.

Celeste Monforton points out that Professor Rick Honaker of the University of Kentucky recently wrote an Op-Ed - but didn’t disclose that his professorship, and his department, take money from mining interests - and made broad and extravagant claims regarding the introduction of H.R. 2768:

In “New Mining Bill Premature,” printed in the Lexington Herald-Leader, Professor Rick Honaker says it is incomprehensible” that Congress is attempting to place new safety requirements on coal operators. * He claims new mandates will “serve no useful purpose” and will “only undermine the efforts of those trying to implement” the 2006 MINER Act. That’s some tough criticism.

On closer look, I notice that neither the op-ed itself nor the professor’s byline mentions his university department’s financial connection to mining industry—an industry that also strongly opposes HR 2768. These ties include a large financial endowment established by the mining industry, called the Mining Engineering Foundation. The Foundation was created in 1983 with a $1 million endowment, which included a hefty donation of $500,000 from Mr. Catesby Clay, president of Kentucky River Coal.** Interest from the fund now provides financial support to school’s mining engineering department.

- snip -

In Dr. Honaker’s case, his byline states:

“Rick Honaker is the Mining Foundation Distinguished Professor and chairman of the University of Kentucky department of mining engineering.”

I’ve since learned that Dr. Honaker’s distinguished professorship is affiliated with the Mining Engineering Foundation, (not the Mining Foundation.) This led me to the information about the group’s financial support of Professor Honaker’s department.

- snip -

Notes:

*In the posted version of Rick Honaker PhD’s op-ed, the yellow highlighted phrases are mine (for emphasis.)

**Mr. Clay was recently honored by the Kentucky Coal Association.

Celeste Monforton’s post at The Pump Handle.

It’s disturbing that the Lexington Herald-Leader couldn’t (or wouldn’t) figure this out for itself - it’s axiomatic that readers are entitled to know who’s speaking - or on whose behalf a speaker works.

If Professor Honaker ever testifies under oath, and makes, or has made, a practice of this omission, he’s laid an elegant foundation for some interesting cross-examination. To quote the noted trial lawyer David Lewis, “Bias is never collateral.”

Let’s suppose for a moment that Honaker is right about the legislation in question. But now, having concealed his financial ties, he’s made a permanant and public record of misleading by omission. If he’s an honest scholar, he’s unfairly damaged his own reputation.

Federal agents are investigating whether several large food companies charged the government excessively high prices for supplies to U.S. troops in Iraq and Kuwait, according to administration officials.Widening their previously disclosed inquiries into contract fraud and corruption in Kuwait and Iraq, investigators from the Justice and Defense departments are examining deals that Sara Lee, ConAgra Foods and other U.S. companies made to supply the military, officials said.

The inquiry centers on whether the companies overcharged Agility Logistics, a Kuwait-based company formerly named Public Warehousing that is the U.S. Army’s principal food supplier for the war zones. Investigators are also reviewing whether Agility Logistics improperly took payments from the food companies.

Agility Logistics, which supplies enormous amounts of fruits, vegetables and meats for more than 160,000 troops in combat zones, said in a statement that it had done nothing wrong and was fully cooperating with the investigation.

But a Justice Department lawyer, Brian Mizoguchi, told a Federal Claims Court judge in Washington on June 12 that the company’s business arrangements were the target of “a very large and active investigation into criminal fraud involving amounts in the hundreds of millions of dollars.”