<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>popular logistics &#187; open source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popularlogistics.com/tag/open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popularlogistics.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>French army sides with Mozilla in Microsoft email war (Reuters via Open Source Pixels</title>
		<link>http://popularlogistics.com/2009/12/french-army-sides-with-mozilla-in-microsoft-email-war/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=french-army-sides-with-mozilla-in-microsoft-email-war</link>
		<comments>http://popularlogistics.com/2009/12/french-army-sides-with-mozilla-in-microsoft-email-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 07:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Soroko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popularlogistics.com/?p=8257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[French army sides with Mozilla in Microsoft email war (Reuters) &#8211; via Open Source Pixels. Reuters takes a look at the use of Thunderbird by the French military. &#8220;The military found Mozilla&#8217;s open source design permitted France to build security extensions, while Microsoft&#8217;s secret, proprietary software allowed no tinkering. &#8220;We started with a military project, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a title="French army sides with Mozilla in Microsoft email war (Reuters)" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.opensourcepixels.com/news/french-army-sides-with-mozilla-in-microsoft-email-war-reuters/">French army sides with Mozilla in Microsoft email war (Reuters)</a> &#8211; via <a title="Open Source Pixels" href="http://www.opensourcepixels.com/">Open Source Pixels.</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>      Reuters takes a look at the use of Thunderbird by the French military. &ldquo;The military found Mozilla&rsquo;s open source design permitted France to build security extensions, while Microsoft&rsquo;s secret, proprietary software allowed no tinkering. &ldquo;We started with a military project, but quickly generalized it,&rdquo; said Lieutenant-Colonel Frederic Suel of the Ministry of Defense and one of those in charge of the project.&rdquo;</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091210/tc_nm/us_mozilla_france">Reuters article here</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Does anyone know how much the United States government spends, let&#8217;s say, on Microsoft Outlook licenses per year? We&#8217;ll try to find out.</p>
<p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://popularlogistics.com/2009/12/french-army-sides-with-mozilla-in-microsoft-email-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DiRT Wiki &#8211; (Digital Resource Tools)</title>
		<link>http://popularlogistics.com/2008/12/dirt-wiki-digital-resource-tools/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dirt-wiki-digital-resource-tools</link>
		<comments>http://popularlogistics.com/2008/12/dirt-wiki-digital-resource-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popularlogistics.com/?p=1330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Wide Aperture, we learn of the Digital Research Tools wiki. While the focus is for academics &#8211; the fact is that &#8211; apart from footnote style &#8211; everything else is has application outside academia.Part of our mission is to develop/identify a &#8220;best practices&#8221; tool set for disaster planning &#8211; particularly community-based groups. So usability, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Via <a href="http://wideaperture.net/">Wide Aperture</a>, we learn of the <a href="http://digitalresearchtools.pbwiki.com/">Digital Research Tools wiki</a>. While the focus is for academics &#8211; the fact is that &#8211; apart from footnote style &#8211; everything else is has application outside academia.</p><p>Part of our mission is to develop/identify a &#8220;best practices&#8221; tool set for disaster planning &#8211; particularly community-based groups. So usability, interoperability, and price are critical variables. the DiRT Wiki is exceptionally well organized, and looks like a good place to look.</p><p>Thanks to <a href="http://wideaperture.net/?page_id=36">Encyclopedia Braun</a> for the link.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://popularlogistics.com/2008/12/dirt-wiki-digital-resource-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

