Author Archives: Jon

Google to track disease outbreaks

Alexis Madrigal of ABCNews reports that Google – and its nonprofit branch, Google.org, will start tracking disease outbreaks.

A new website, HealthMap, addresses that challenge by siphoning up text from Google News, the World Health Organization and online discussion groups, then filtering it and boiling it down into mapped data that researchers — and the public — can use to track new disease outbreaks, region by region.

“There is so much information on the web about disease outbreaks but it’s obscured by garbage and noise,” said John Brownstein, a professor at Harvard Medical School, and co-founder of HealthMap.org. “The idea of HealthMap is to get filtered, valuable information to the public and public health community in one freely available resource.”

The site’s free accessibility could be particularly important in the developing world, where poor public health infrastructure and lack of money has handicapped epidemiological efforts. That’s a problem because those regions are exactly where scientists predict new and dangerous diseases are likely to emerge.

HealthMap goes beyond the standard mashup and is more like a small-scale implementation of the long-awaited semantic web. The site, which the researchers describe in the latest issue of open access PLoS Medicine, creates machine-readable public health information from the text indexed by Google News, World Health Organization updates and online listserv discussions

Researchers Track Disease With Google News, Google.org Money

British having difficult adjustment to recycling

Sarah Lyall reports in the Times that the British, trailing EU countries in recycling, are experiencing some friction trying to catch up:

WHITEHAVEN, England — The citizens of Whitehaven try, really they do. They separate out their cans, their paper, their cardboard and their glass, and they recycle them all. They compost. They jump up and down on their trash to cram it into their government-issued garbage cans, and they put the trash out for collection at exactly 7 a.m., twice a month.

But when Gareth Corkhill, a bus driver, was fined $215 — and given a further $225 fine and a criminal record when he failed to pay — for leaving his garbage can lid slightly ajar this spring, Whitehaven’s residents banded together in dismay. They raised the money to pay the fine, and they began to complain.

“I consider the fine against Mr. Corkhill to be a matter of injustice, really, and as a Christian minister I’m required to speak out against injustice,” declared the Rev. John Bannister, the rector of Whitehaven, a seaside town in Cumbria, in the far northwest. Referring to the garbage cans residents here use, he said, “To be given a criminal record for leaving your wheelie bin open by three inches has, I think, really gone beyond the bounds of responsible behavior.”

Across Europe, residents are struggling to adjust to a new era of garbage rules. Britain, particularly, is in the midst of a trash crisis, with dwindling landfill space and one of Europe’s poorest recycling records. Threatened with steep fines if they dump too much trash, local governments around the country are imposing strict regimens to force residents to produce less and recycle more.

Many now collect trash every other week, instead of every week. They restrict households to a limited amount of garbage, and refuse to pick up more. They require that garbage be put out only at strict times, reject whole boxes of recyclables that contain the odd nonrecyclable item and employ enforcement officers who issue warnings and impose fines for failure to comply.

In an era of dwindling environmental resources, garbage-heavy societies like Britain’s are under growing pressure to change their profligate ways. “These are challenging times, and the U.K. is behind the game when it comes to relying on landfills,” said Beverley Parr, a spokeswoman for the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Or, as Ian Curwen, a spokesman for Copeland Borough Council, which encompasses Whitehaven, said: “Ultimately as a country, we have to do more. We can’t just keep producing and throwing things away.”

But Britons do not like being told what to do. Encouraged by anti-government newspapers, they particularly resent government meddling, as they see it, in such intimate matters as the contents of their garbage cans. As regulations get more stringent and enforcement more robust, there have been reports across the country of incensed residents shouting and throwing trash at garbage collectors, illegally dumping and burning excess garbage, and even surreptitiously tossing trash in — or stealing — their neighbors’ garbage cans.

“It’s like something out of ‘Mad Max,’ ” Paul Nicholls, a resident of Cannock, near Birmingham, told the newspaper The Guardian recently, describing the free-for-all in his town at garbage-collection time. “Every man for himself, scavenging for an extra bin.”

The government says the new regulations are necessary if Britain is to adjust to the changing times. Along with the rest of Europe, Britain has been ordered to reduce the waste it puts in landfills — by 2015, to 50 percent of what it was in 1995 — or face untold millions of dollars in European Union fines.

That means that people have to completely rethink their relationship to their refuse, said Paul Bettison, chairman of the environment board of the Local Government Association.

“It’s a sad thing to have to shatter people’s illusions, but gone are the days when we could put all our rubbish and junk in a big bag and overnight the fairy would come and take it away, and that would be the end of it,” Mr. Bettison said. “The rubbish fairy is dead.”

The twice-a-month collection regime, now in use in more than half the country, is particularly unpopular and became a contentious issue in recent local elections, in which the ruling Labor Party was trounced by its opponents. Among other things, said Doretta Cocks, who runs the 22,000-member Campaign for Weekly Waste Collection, having infrequent collections creates a health hazard, what with the smell, the maggots and the rats.

“It’s supposed to be environmentally friendly, but it’s not,” Mrs. Cocks said. “How can it be environmentally friendly to have two weeks’ worth of rubbish in your house?”

Whitehaven provides many of its homeowners with an array of recycling bins as well as government-regulation wheelie bins that are often modest in size, to say the least, holding perhaps four black garbage bags.

Into these they are expected to stuff their two weeks’ worth of garbage.

“My bin’s always full,” said a 62-year-old Whitehaven resident, who says that he can force five bags in there if he jumps on them vigorously enough. He is engaged in a running battle with the garbage collectors. Once he put an extra bag of trash on top of his bin; they refused to pick it up and left the garbage from the now-ripped bag sprawled on the street. Once, when he failed to close his lid properly, he received a “nasty note saying it was overloaded,” he said.

The note was followed by a sticker of shame affixed to the bin announcing that he was violating local garbage laws. The man, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he is afraid of running afoul of the authorities, says he now regularly takes his extra trash out to an empty field and burns it.

Ms. Parr, the environmental department spokeswoman, said that in 1997 Britain recycled just 7 percent of its waste, compared with 33 percent now. (More than 60 percent of its waste ends up in landfills, compared with 55 percent for the United States in 2006.) Britain is poised to experiment with programs under which households would pay according to how much garbage they threw out, just as they pay for water or electricity.

Under one idea, people’s bins would be fitted with microchips, enabling local councils to record the weight or volume of garbage per household. Although such bins are used already in other European countries, even the prospect has critics in Britain muttering about Big Brother and creeping taxation.

In Whitehaven, the residents are annoyed enough about the rules they already have.

Claire Corkhill, whose husband received the fine for their open bin, is still recovering from the indignity of having two uniformed garbage enforcement officers, or “garbage police,” as they are known locally, show up at her house.

She said they were wearing protective vests. “My sister is a police officer, so we thought it was a joke, to be honest.”

Mr. Curwen, the local council spokesman, said the Corkhills had failed to respond to several warnings. “They got a sticker, and then a letter, and then another letter saying, ‘Would you like us to come round and discuss your waste situation with you, because we need to reduce our land filling and the fines are quite steep,’ ” he said.

Mr. Curwen said that people in similar situations — unable to close their bins because of too much garbage — should telephone the council. “We can give you tips on recycling and reducing waste,” he said.

Mr. Bettison of the Local Government Association said there would always be some people who needed extra prodding.

“To encourage people to do something, you start off by asking them ‘Please,’ ” he said. “Then you say ‘Pretty please.’ But if they don’t respond to carrots, you have to move a little more along the scale that has carrots on one end and sticks on the other. You have to make it a little more difficult for them not to recycle.”

Take Out the Trash Precisely, Now. It’s the Law.

Tags: , ,

GM announces plans for “world’s largest rooftop solar array”

Matthew L. Wald – who reliably turns out ahead-of-the-pack energy stories – with lots of detail, good news and bad – got to write about GM’s announcement that it plans to build the world’s largest rooftop solar array. “Large Solar Array Set for G.M. in Spain.

Solar array being installed on roof of General Motors in Spain

The array will power a G.M. manufacturing plant. (For his labors – Wald didn’t even get to go to Spain – but apparently he didn’t have to go to Detroit either, so perhaps it’s a wash).

Why is GM building this in Spain? Because the Spanish current subsidize solar at a rate five times that of the United States.

Hawaii to require solar hot water heaters in new residential construction

MetaEfficient reports that starting in 2010, Hawaii will require solar hot water heaters in new residential construction

Hawaii has become the first state to require solar water heaters in new homes. The bill was signed into law by Governor Linda Lingle, a Republican. It requires the energy-saving systems in homes starting in 2010. It prohibits issuing building permits for single-family homes that do not have solar water heaters. Hawaii relies on imported fossil fuels more than any other state, with about 90 percent of its energy sources coming from foreign countries, according to state data.

The new law prohibits issuing building permits for single-family homes that do not have solar water heaters. Some exceptions will be allowed, such as forested areas where there are low amounts of sunshine.

State Sen. Gary Hooser, vice chairman of the Energy and Environment Committee, first introduced the measure five years ago when he said a barrel of oil cost just $40. Since then, the cost of oil has more than tripled.

“It’s abundantly clear that we need to take some serious action to protect Hawaii because we’re so dependent on oil,” Hooser said. “I’m very pleased the governor is recognizing the importance of this bill and the huge public benefits that come out of it.”

Other Resources

Makezine – several recipes for DIY solar hot water heaters

Another recipe from Makezine

From the Sietch – a solar water heater

also suitable for distillation, purification, and possible boiling/cooking. Thanks to Sustainable Design Update for the link

Safety of Medical Helicopters; NYT coverage

Barry Meier wrote this excellent overview of the medical helicopter industry, which followed two excellent pieces by John Dougherty. From Meier’s piece:

The fatal collision Sunday between two medical helicopters in Arizona was the sixth crash involving the emergency helicopters since May, making the last two months one of the deadliest periods in the history of the fast-growing industry.Sixteen people have died this year in seven crashes, which involved eight helicopters, according to federal data. Thirteen of the deaths have come since May.

About 750 medical helicopters are operating in this country, about twice the number flying a decade ago. Medical helicopters were once operated mostly by hospitals, but in recent years private companies, including some that are publicly traded, have come to dominate the industry.

The chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board, Mark Rosenker, said the agency was greatly concerned about the spate of crashes. The board began to investigate the industry after a rash of accidents in 2004 and 2005.

In a report in 2006, it found that operators had failed to develop comprehensive flight risk programs, and that pilots often did not have adequate information about bad weather they might have encountered or equipment to alert them to dangerous terrain.

The board called for stricter flight rules and improved accident-avoidance equipment, among other recommendations.

The Federal Aviation Administration accepted all of the board’s recommendations, Mr. Rosenker said, but has put only some of them into effect.

“The latest spate of accidents has given the board concern that the F.A.A. may not be moving as quickly as necessary,” Mr. Rosenker said in a telephone interview on Monday evening.

Medical Helicopter Crashes Stir Concern

And links to Mr. Dougherty’s pieces:Crashes of Medical

Aircraft Examined , and 6 Killed and 3 Are Injured as Copters Collide

. The Times doesn’t hyperlink Mr. Dougherty’s byline; perhaps this is the equivalent of being a “made man” in certain organizations with which we’re familiar.

Iran’s surprising non-punitive addiction treatment strategy

In a country so harsh about other matters of personal autonomy (sex, in particular) I found it surprising that Iran would have a progressive syringe exchange policy and and a fairly gentle drug regime. From Nazila Fathi’s June 27th piece in the Times,“Iran Fights Scourge of Addiction in Plain View, Stressing Treatment:”

More than a million Iranians are addicted to some form of opium, heroin or other opium derivative, according to the government, and some estimates run as high as 10 million.

In a country where the discussion of some social and cultural issues, like homosexuality, can be all but taboo, drug addiction has been widely acknowledged as a serious problem. It is talked about openly in schools and on television. Posters have encouraged people to think of addiction as a disease and to seek treatment.

Iran’s theocratic government has encouraged and financed a vast expansion in the number of drug treatment centers to help users confront their addictions and to combat the spread of H.I.V., the virus that causes AIDS, through shared needles.

The center in central Tehran, which is called Congress 60 and is run by a private nonprofit agency, is one of 600 centers that provide drug treatment across the country with help from government money. An additional 1,250 centers offer methadone, free needles and other services for addicts who are not ready to quit, including food and treatment for H.I.V. and other sexually transmitted infections.

Iran’s government, trying to curb addiction’s huge social costs, has been more supportive of drug treatment than any other government in the Islamic world, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

It was not always this way. After the 1979 revolution, the government tried a more traditional approach: arresting drug users and putting them in jail.

But two decades later, it recognized that this approach had failed. A sharp increase in the crime rate and the number of people infected with H.I.V., both directly linked to a surge in narcotics use, persuaded the government to shift strategies.

“We have realized that an addict is a social reality,” said Muhammad-Reza Jahani, the vice president for the Committee Combating Drugs, which coordinates the government’s efforts to fight drug addiction and trafficking. “We don’t want to fight addicts; we want to fight addiction. We need to manage addiction.”

Apart from the observation that this is yet another piece of evidence that non-punitive approaches are more effective than “war on drugs” – it also suggest that the Iranian government is capable of changing course, rethinking problems – and thus perhaps – under the right circumstances – able to negotiate.

Tags: ,

, , , ,

NYTimes: Scrap metal has doubled in price

Ann Farmer, in the Times, (“In the Metal Recycling Business, It’s Loud, Dirty and Suddenly Lucrative”) reports that the price of scrap metal has more than doubled in a year.

From Farmer’s piece dated June 27th:

Bob Rommeney steered his flatbed truck into a scrap-metal recycling plant in Brooklyn and unloaded two battered cars that had been wrecked days earlier at Riverhead Raceway on Long Island.

Within hours, the discarded vehicles would have their wheels removed, their fluids drained and their bodies crushed into 3-by-4-foot squares. Mr. Rommeney, 54, a retired city sanitation worker, would return home to Maspeth, Queens, about $400 richer.

“It’s worth it to come here and scrap the cars,” he said the other day, waiting his turn in the yard to drive his flatbed onto a large scale. There, workers compared its weight with what it weighed when it arrived at the yard, which is owned by A.R.C. Metal Recycling, to determine how much he should be paid. “Three years ago, I would have gotten about $50 a car,” Mr. Rommeney said. “The money went up.”

It is a very good time for anyone involved in the scrap-metal business. People who collect scrap metal and take it to recycling facilities are getting higher rates for their deliveries.

In turn, metal-recycling companies are selling more scrap metal, particularly to customers in China, India and other developing nations, who are paying record prices. A.R.C. Metal Recycling has recently been selling its scrap steel for close to $500 a ton, more than double the price it received a year ago.

“It’s booming, and it’s still growing,” said Michael Allocco, 24, the general manager of the A.R.C. recycling plant, one of 68 scrap metal processing firms licensed by the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs. The number of these businesses has grown nearly 20 percent in three years.

But the increase in the price of scrap metal has led to a rise in the theft of metal products, particularly anything made of copper. Mr. Allocco said he is vigilant about trying to ensure that none of the metal that is brought to his plant was stolen.

“I don’t accept the shopping-cart guys,” he said, adding that the police had visited the plant with photographs of people suspected of stealing metal, asking if anyone had seen them.

Mr. Allocco takes precautions like photographing his customers and keeping their driver’s licenses on file. “I try to keep the place on the up and up.”

Mr. Allocco’s plant is located in an industrial part of the Greenpoint neighborhood, alongside Newtown Creek and across the street from a new sewage treatment plant, whose bulbous towers add to a surreal landscape. Allocco Recycling, a transfer station for dirt, concrete and other types of fill, was founded by Mr. Allocco’s father on the two-and-a-half-acre site 20 years ago.

A.R.C., which is open 24 hours, buys hundreds of tons of ferrous metal a day. A large portion of it is steel.

The company also buys thousands of pounds of nonferrous metal daily, which is placed in a warehouse, where a mound of brass car radiators sits alongside a collection of sinks, stacks of aluminum window frames and buckets of copper wiring.

“Nonferrous is worth more,” said Bill Monteleone, A.R.C.’s director of sales. He explained how customers are paid based on the type of metal they sell and whether they have separated the metals.

“The more you fine-tune it, the more you separate, the more money you get,” said Kevin Westhall, 39, who runs a small business removing items from the homes of people who have died. He strips the insulation from old copper wiring and he pries the nonferrous metal out of washing machines.

Separating the metal is hard work, said Mr. Westhall, who makes as many as five trips a day to the recycling yard. “I walk around like a magnet,” he said. “Metal is always on my mind.”

Tags:

Kirkwood Community College in Cedar Rapids housing displaced pets, helping to reunite owners and pets

Kirkwood Community College, particularly its veterinary science program, is sheltering hundreds of pets displaced by the floods. According to this story by Kathy Kaiser, of the Kirkwood News Service:

A dedicated team at Kirkwood Community College has taken in hundreds of pets rescued from the record flooding in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. The Iowa Equestrian Center on the college campus has been transformed into an emergency animal shelter to assist the Cedar Rapids city facility overwhelmed by the flooding situations of mid-June 2008.

Black Labrador 54 - via Kirkwood News Service

Along with the hundreds of cats and dogs in the Kirkwood flood shelter you will see geckos, a green lizard, an iguana, a rabbit, a macaw, birds of all sizes and a cage full of rats.

There are some local “celebrities,” too: The dog rescued from a roof by firefighters, Sam the cat featured in the local newspaper. Others have stories that may never be told until and unless they are reunited with their human companions.

As the more than 370 animals arrived, they were evaluated by one of three teams consisting of a veterinarian, a vet technician and vet assistant. Kirkwood Animal Health Professor Anne Duffy estimates 85 percent have owners. The others have been separated from their families, were from the animal shelter or simply strays.

Some animals arrived with their families who lost everything and were heading for one of the local shelters set up in school gymnasiums and churches. After losing everything they owned in the floods, it was difficult to leave their pets.

Kirkwood also has a Community Training and Response Program, and its affiliations include AgTerror , a program whose purpose is to make agricultural targets less attractive to attackers, and more resilient in case of attack. Pretty cool for a community college.

Con Ed Urged to Improve Its Response to Gas Leaks/P.S.C. gently applies pressure to Con Edison

Ken Belson of the Times reported in June that state investigators had “suggested … ways that Consolidated Edison and the New York City Fire Department can better coordinate their response to gas leaks.”

After a seven-month investigation, the Public Service Commission is recommending that the utility ask firefighters to remain until safe conditions are restored, improve the way information about gas leaks is shared and set parameters for ordering evacuations.

The Fire Department and Con Edison were criticized for how they handled the deadly explosion, at a house in Sunnyside, on Nov. 21. The Fire Department said it did nothing wrong when it left after checking a report of a gas odor because Con Edison officials had taken control of the situation. The utility said it acted appropriately because it did not have information suggesting that any of the people in the houses in the area were in danger.

A 69-year-old woman, Kunta Oza, who lived at 48-19 41st Street, died a day after being burned in the explosion.

Con Edison, which said it followed its established procedures for dealing with gas leaks on the day of the explosion, has since improved its protocols, a spokesman said on Wednesday.

“We’ve worked closely with the Fire Department with respect to improving procedures for responding to gas complaints, maintaining emergency personnel presence on site and coordinating evacuations when necessary,” said the spokesman, Michael Clendenin.

Con Edison has already implemented some of the “actions to improve safety” that were recommended by the Public Service Commission. On Wednesday, staff investigators discussed their findings from the explosion at a commission meeting in Albany. The investigation is complete, but the report has not yet been released.

But Kenneth P. Thompson, a lawyer who is representing Mrs. Oza’s family in a civil suit against Con Edison, said the investigators’ findings showed that “Con Ed was negligent and caused Mrs. Oza’s death.” The report, he said, includes details about rusted gas pipes.

“Con Ed had a duty to fix that pipe, and that it wasn’t on their priority list shows they were negligent,” Mr. Thompson said. Mrs. Oza’s family is seeking $100 million in damages from Con Edison.

Officials for Con Edison said the utility did not comment on pending lawsuits.

Councilman Eric N. Gioia, who represents Sunnyside, said the commission had ignored the destruction caused by the explosion and should penalize Con Edison. (The commission did not assess penalties as part of the investigation.)

“The Public Service Commission continues to confirm our worst fears that they are little more than a public shield for Con Ed’s behavior instead of being the watchdog they need to be,” Mr. Gioia said. “Whether it’s getting electrocuted, steam pipe explosions or this, at most, the Public Service Commission gives them a slap on the wrist.”

Con Ed Urged to Improve Its Response to Gas Leaks, June 19, 2008 .

Interestingly, the Public Service Commission entitled its press release

GAS DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES IMPROVE SAFETY RECORD
-Effort Underway to Further Improve Safety Performance

On the same day that it expanded the definition of “major” system failure so that it means a system failure for 10% or more of Con Ed’s customers a maximum fine of $10 million, and a maximum of three

incidents per year. ” PSC Redefines Major Outages for Con Edison.” Have three major incidents – and the fourth, fifth and sixth – and every later one – are on the house. – Con Ed admits to having 3.176 million customers (SeeCon Ed Fact Sheet here) – so the message here is – try to keep the system failures to 300,000 customers or less – but if things get very bad – you’ll never have to pay more than $30 million in fines.

This doesn’t seem like a particularly effective deterrent.

See also:

Queens Crap Blog coverage of Con Edison issue(s)

New York Sun coverage of Con Ed

Texas approves massive wind farm

Doug Myers of the Abilene Online Reporter News reports that the Texas Public Utility Commission has approved a massive windpower array (and the necessary transmission lines) which is expected “to handle enough wind-generated electricity to power more than 4 million homes.” From Winds of change: More jobs, lower rates for Big Country, state

The Texas Public Utility Commission’s action opens the door for construction of a far-reaching web of transmission lines that, when completed at a cost of nearly $5 billion over four or five years, would be able to handle enough wind-generated electricity to power more than 4 million homes. The electricity will go to some of the state’s most populous areas, including Dallas, San Antonio and Houston.

Paying for the PUC plan would add roughly $4 per month to residential customer bills after construction is completed.

Passage of the plan is “a real big deal,” said Sweetwater Mayor Greg Wortham, who also heads the West Texas Wind Energy Consortium. “It’s good for Abilene, good for Sweetwater, good for the region.”

Good, in fact, for the entire state of Texas, Wortham said.

“This will bring billions more dollars of investment to Texas in the form of wind equipment, construction, local revenues and jobs,” said Susan Williams Sloan, spokeswoman for the Washington, D.C.-based American Wind Energy Association.

“It will certainly help out wind energy farm developers, and I think we’ll be pleasantly surprised with the amount of wind turbines this will support,” said Rep. Joe Heflin, D-Crosbyton.

“Hang on. The winds of change are coming to West Texas, and you’re in for a boon,” said Tom “Smitty” Smith, director of Public Citizen’s Texas office.

“We think it’s going to reduce cost, reduce pollution and create jobs,” Smith said. “It’s going to be particularly beneficial for the West Texas region of the state.”

While construction costs will be passed along to customers, Smith said ultimately they will be better off because of the wind-energy plan. Smith said his nonprofit, Ralph Nader-founded group determined, based on rising fuel costs, that the wind-generated power would save consumers about $8 a month in electric costs.

Smith’s group also concluded thousands of wind industry-related jobs will result, tens of millions of dollars will be generated in local taxes, and landowners will receive lucrative royalties as a result of the transmission lines running through their properties. He said the gains would primarily be enjoyed in West Texas, although some of the manufacturing jobs would be in East Texas and El Paso.

“What’s happened in West Texas is there are these little, tiny transmission lines equivalent to two-lane country roads that aren’t set up to move megawatts on a superhighway to our cities,” Smith said.

Wind energy from West Texas flows through a substation in Graham that is ill-equipped to be a power hub for cities such as Houston and Dallas, Wortham said. Energy congestion at the Graham substation is causing the wind farms to have to take turns temporarily shutting down to curtail output.

“It gives the green light to wind developers who had wondered if they could plug in and if they could get their power to market,” Smith said. “What the wind turbine companies have told us, ‘If you build the lines, we’ll come.'”

The PUC action also sends the message to wind industry manufacturers that Texas “wants to become a world-class leader in wind development,” he said.

Inhabitat: Solar Rickshaws in development

Mahesh Basantani at Inhabitat reports that SolarLab, in London, is working on a solar rickshaw

. We’ve written before about the Serpentine Shuttle – also by SolarLab – a solar ferry boat which collects enough power that it has reserves for night operation and returns power to the grid. (Thought of another way – it’s a floating, movable solar power array – with room for passengers).

More properly credited – DeZeen – via Inhabitat.

This is a proper moment to note that we don’t check Inhabitat as often as we should – they’re exceptionally on their game, and we find ourselves greatly tempted to plagiarize. Interestingly, where the Inhabitat staff see sustainability – we also see disaster risk reduction and disaster preparedness. It’s not a big jump from a solar-powered boat or rickshaw to solar-powered patient transportation in a disaster. But if you’re looking for new technology that’s sustainable in the long term, that will reduce disaster risk – and mitigate disaster effects – be reading Inhabitat regularly.

Mosquito threat in Wisconsin – Futurismic

Thanks to Futurismic for their post –

The Mosquitoes Are Coming! reports Futurismic, based in Wisconsin, where

the record rainfalls over the past month have become something of a concern. The biggest water-related concern Southeast Wisconsin – Milwaukee in specific – has had in the last 20 years is the cryptosporidium scare we had in 1993 . Now, though, with nearly an entire summer’s worth of rain in just less than a week, we’re in trouble. Why? Mosquitoes.

The biggest hazard with mosquitoes in Wisconsin in the West Nile Virus. With large – and I’m talking football-field-sized – ponds all over the area, it’s prime breeding grounds for large quantities of mosquitoes that carry the virus. The National Health Administration and the CDC have warned of a possible outbreak. It’s one of those concerns that a people don’t really think about, and it carries potentially lethal outcomes.

disease outbreak – one that happened too far north – and too early in the season, anyway – and therefore at least possibly related to global warming.

We wish our midwestern cousins well – perhaps this is a moment for many squeegees – and new uses for the sandbags as the flood waters recede.

Thanks to Futurismic for this report.

Patrick McGeehan, NYT: A Bikes-Only Parking Lot in Midtown?

Patrick McGeehan

of the Times City Room Blog

reports that

A few business executives have dreamed up a private-sector solution to the problem of secure bicycle parking in New York: the city’s first bikes-only parking lot. They have a space on West 33rd Street. All they need is a corporation willing to pay as much as $200,000 a year to sponsor it.

“We’re really looking for a big number to build something quite spectacular,” said Daniel A. Biederman, president of the 34th Street Partnership. “We want this to be the premier bike parking facility in the country.”

Already, the group has cleared one high hurdle: Stonehenge Management, a developer, has offered a 2,600-square-foot lot next to an apartment building it owns on the north side of 33rd Street between Eighth Avenue and Ninth Avenue, Mr. Biederman said.

The partnership, which is financed by businesses and property owners in a 31-block section of Midtown, has developed a preliminary design for the lot and has ordered up a prototype of the racks it would contain, Mr. Biederman said. At first, it would hold 100 bikes, with room to expand if there is more demand, he said.

A Bikes-Only Parking Lot in Midtown?

 

 

ChannelLock 6-in-1 emergency tool

From the indispensable folks at Popular Mechanics. Seems worth having in a go-bag. Since we’re of the belief that “go” should be organized in groups, with great attention paid to weight – we’re reluctant to suggest one in every go bag – but one or two in every group seems sounds.

The six features are:

  • side-cutting electrician pliers. According to Popular Mechanics, “Cut into both its jaws is a heavy-duty cross hatching that grips with a vengeance.” That is, powerful pliers, and

  • wire-cutting capability

  • gas shut-off wrench – and on the same handle

  • a pry bar.

  • On the opposite handle, a spanner wrench and

  • a glass punch for breaking through car windows

Channellock 6-N-1 Rescue Tool from Popular Mechanics’ Best of the 2008 National Hardware Show. by Roy Berendsohn.